Bloomington AI
HomeElectionsNewsCity HallCommunityWeather

©2026 Bloomington AI

  • Archive
  • FAQ
  • Data
  • Sitemap
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
Home/City Hall/Pet store and circus animal rules: What's next

Pet store and circus animal rules: What's next

By JR
Updated 13d ago·3 min read
Pet store and circus animal rules: What's next

TLDR: Residents asked the City Council to keep puppy-mill sales and wild-animal acts out of Bloomington. The council has sent staff to look into 2 ordinances, and parking sign changes are headed to a study session.

Bloomington City CouncilCouncil asks staff to explore humane pet store and animal-free circus ordinances; parking sign changes to get study session 2:55:35Animal FolksPet storesCity of Bloomington agendaOn the agenda: City Council Listening Session, October 12

Bloomington may write 2 new animal rules into city code. One would be a humane pet store ordinance, modeled on New Hope's. The other would bar circuses that use wild animals. Neither has been drafted yet. On October 12, the City Council asked staff to look into both, and that request is the whole of the story so far.

City of Bloomington@CityofBloomingtonMN

Council members turn resident requests into asks for staff, covering the 2 animal ordinances and a revisit of parking signs.10/12

The idea came from residents. The council held a listening session before its regular meeting that Monday, at 5:45 p.m. in the Haeg Conference Room at Civic Plaza. The posted agenda had no topics on it, just an open floor. Residents used that time to raise the pet store and circus questions.

Later in the regular meeting, Council Member Dallessandro brought both ideas back to the table and asked staff to study them. The mayor said he supported the idea. One speaker called them "potential preemptive ordinances," one around a humane pet store and one around circuses with wild animals. No one has written a draft, so there are no definitions, penalties or effective dates yet.

City of Bloomington@CityofBloomingtonMN

A council member names the 2 ordinances residents raised and calls them 'preemptive.'10/12

Calling them "preemptive" fits how these rules usually work. Humane pet store ordinances are meant to stop pet stores from selling puppy-mill puppies. The model is a store that doesn't sell commercially bred animals, according to the Minnesota advocacy group Animal Folks. The group says Roseville was the first Minnesota city to pass one and St. Paul has passed one too. For Bloomington, the question is whether to set those rules before any business shows up that they would affect.

Parking signs are also headed to a future council study session, where members discuss an issue without voting.

Nothing is scheduled yet. Staff have to come back with research before there's anything to vote on. If the council wants to move ahead, an ordinance would go through the usual readings and public notice before it could take effect. No date has been set for the staff report or for the parking sign study session. This story will be updated as each one lands on an agenda.

To weigh in, residents can do what got these ideas started: speak at a council listening session at Civic Plaza, or contact their council member directly. The earlier you speak up, the more say you'll have in what goes into a draft.

From the meeting: City Council Meeting, October 12, 2026.

More stories

  • Native American Heritage Month: Council's proclamation

    Native American Heritage Month: Council's proclamation

  • State sewer grant: What the council is signing

    State sewer grant: What the council is signing

  • Surface water plan: Council to pick a consultant

    Surface water plan: Council to pick a consultant

  • Fire Station 2 rebuild: Council to hire a builder

    Fire Station 2 rebuild: Council to hire a builder

  • I-494, 35W frontage roads: City set to take them over

    I-494, 35W frontage roads: City set to take them over

  • Hopkins Road stub becomes Mission Road after 5-0 council vote

    Hopkins Road stub becomes Mission Road after 5-0 council vote